This weekend, we turned off our lights from 8-9pm to show solidarity for “Earth Hour.” As I sat in darkness, watching the basketball games and looking at the relatively dark Sears Tower, my mind naturally turned to the issue of environmentalism, which I guess was the point of the exercise. Like many topics today, this one has turned into quite the hot-button topic over the past few years. People are allowing themselves to be swept up in the tide of being environmentally friendly and conscious of our “carbon footprint.” (By the way, I have to say that I think this phrase is ridiculously stupid. I can barely say it without busting up in laughter. I appreciate the sentiment, but can’t we use a different phrase?) The issues of environmentalism are many and varied. The topics I want to focus on are three-fold: the fact that it is a travesty that the issue has become politicized – it’s a problem that could destroy the movement itself; the rabid ideals associated with saving the environment could quickly infringe on our Constitutional rights without providing adequate alternatives; and being environmentally conscious is, at its base, an issue of respect – for nature and for the generations of people who will (hopefully) come after us.
I’m not going to lie, I did find the idea of “Earth Hour” mildly ridiculous. While there were many cities around the world that participated in Earth Hour and the point of it was to raise awareness that people really don’t need to leave lights on all the time – the people who are leaving lights on all the time have to be aware of the energy they are wasting. I think the big cities show a prime example. When I look at a city’s night skyline (one of my favorite views), it is not just apartment lights and street lights that are brightening the night sky. Office buildings leave their lights on at night for the inhabitants. One of the most glaring deficiencies of the ideas surrounding Earth Hour is that people aren’t aware of the energy they are using up. I can guarantee that the people keeping these lights on in the office buildings are very aware of the cost to keep certain lights on all the time. And it’s not going to change unless those leasing the office space start accepting that they shouldn’t be at their office at midnight, so those lights shouldn’t be on. If you take a good look at downtown and midtown Manhattan, those lights are not from individual people being irresponsible, they are from businesses and companies either promoting their business or just leaving their lights on ALL THE TIME. While I hope that Earth Hour can raise awareness (because otherwise I sat in the dark for an hour cutting ribbon for no reason), it seems that the awareness it does raise won’t do much good.
One of the worst things to happen to environmentalism was politics. When politicians began to do the work of scientists, they immediately started destroying the cause from within. Why do I say that? Well, look at the polarization of the US government. As I have mentioned before, both Republicans and Democrats have issues compromising with eachother, and the frequent stalling of bills, etc, in Congress easily reveals that problem. Neither side seems willing to give an inch to the other side unless they get something for it in return. The topic of environmentalism has become one that if people know you are a Republican, you are immediately thought of as anti-environment and if you are known to be a Democrat, you are immediately thought of as an environmentalist. Completely ignored are the scientific facts, instead it is more the way the political wind has decided to blow that decides critical factors involving the environment. The topic of global warming has illustrated this fact far better than any words could.
Here’s the thing about the climate. It cannot be denied that it’s changing. Yes the earth is warming up. But scientific reports also show that other planets are warming up as well. From the 14th Century to the end of the 19th Century, the earth was going through a mini-ice age. There is scientific evidence for this, and many books have been written about it (a fantastic one is The Little Ice Age: How Climate Made History, 1300-1850by Brian Fagan). So after coming out of the Little Ice Age, naturally the world is going to start warming up a little more. However, right around the time the Little Ice Age melted (ha!) was also when the Industrial Revolutions really got going around the world. The thing is, smog didn’t exist until fossil fuels were used during and after the Industrial Revolutions. Air quality wasn’t something people had to worry about. But then again, they also didn’t have the technology to understand what air quality was. As we become more and more advanced in technology, to devote our resources to finding less hazardous means of running our machines is not an unworthy cause. HOWEVER, until we find those solutions, please do not think that forcing unhealthy alternatives upon the populous is the answer.
What do I mean by “unhealthy alternatives?” Well, for starters, the wonder of the new fluorescent light bulbs the EPA is trying to force on us. Do you realize what is in these light bulbs? Mercury. You know, the stuff that is found in thermometers, and used to be involved in making hats. The same toxic material that helped give us the term “mad as a hatter.” Studies have also shown that people with certain diseases, for example eczema, should not be around the fluorescent bulbs because they will aggravate the disease. AND, when removing a broken bulb, you have to treat it as a hazardous waste spill!! You have to LEAVE THE ROOM for 15 min and turn off central air/heat, among other alarming precautions! I’m not making this up, either, it’s on the government website (http://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/promotions/change_light/downloads/Fact_Sheet_Mercury.pdf)!!!!
So now, the EPA wants to completely phase out incandescent light bulbs and replace them with energy saving bulbs. In fact, by 2012-2014, all light bulbs must be 25-35% more efficient according to a law signed in December 2007 (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/12/20071219-6.html). So what alternatives do we have? Fluorescent bulbs (hazardous), LED bulbs, and halogen bulbs. While these certainly save energy, the technology is not there yet to have a phase-out law!!! It is no wonder that there are people so opposed to the environmentalist movement when stuff like this is happening.
Another example is the use of ethanol. A derivative of corn, it was being hailed as the next alternative energy source that was going to revolutionize the industry – we weren’t going to need oil anymore, etc. Well, then they found out that the use of corn ethanol was actually MORE harmful to the environment than oil! It’s worse in carbon dioxide emissions, VOCs, and takes up unnecessary amounts of land (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel). Now people have, finally, started to back off the ethanol fuel thing, but at what cost?
Don’t be under the mistaken assumption that I am not an environmentalist. I most certainly am. I think it’s devastating to the movement that it has been politicized but I am also aware of the alarming effect humans have on the planet. There are over 6 billion people living on this earth. There have never before been numbers like that. We are all interacting with each other, many enjoying a style of living never seen before. It would be foolish and ignorant to presume that we would have no effect whatsoever on the fragile ecosystems of the world. Whether or not we are causing global warming should not be the issue. What should be the issue is that we need to preserve the world for the generations to come. We need to protect the species of animals so that our descendants can see them in person instead of reading about them in history books. If you want a perfect example of the effect of humans on an ecosystem, look at the extinct dodo bird and other animals that have felt the wrath of overhunting. There is most certainly a cycle that is being disrupted, and the more we as humans ignore it, the more perilous the situation becomes. For those of you who may remember, there was a cartoon show on for a while called Captain Planet. Remember? There were the 5 teens from around the world who had rings and represented the elements – earth, fire, wind, water, and heart (what?) and they would come together and call upon Captain Planet to save the world from evil-doers harming nature and the environment. And then at the end, it would have an eco-friendly message. Totally indicative of the early 1990’s cheeseball shows, it nevertheless had a good message. Like most superhero shows, it made the evil-doers obviously evil, and the do-gooders obviously good. Unfortunately for us, it’s not that simple. But it did show that by many people doing a little can have a lot of impact.
So in the changing climate (ha!) of being environmentally-conscious, it’s important to note that at least we are trying. To be dependant on oil from foreign sources is a horrible mistake, but so is being dependant on oil from internal sources (ref: oil in Alaska). History has proven that to be dependant on one source for all methods of energy is definitely not good, so we must try to find new, alternative forms of energy as the technology is available to us. But until that technology is better proven, we cannot assume that forcing it on the public is the correct answer. However, caring for the environment is, most importantly, a matter of respect for our surroundings and for our future. So until we have this technology – recycle, reuse, buy a hybrid car instead of a normal one, turn off your lights and electronics when you don’t need them, and be conscious of what you are destroying.
Be part of the movement that rebuilds rather than destroys.


